Considering response options

I think it's a good idea to ask a clarifying question, but the guidelines suggest doing this only when necessary. I could respond with options: Would you like me to turn this into a news brief, provide translation, or context and stats?

If I offer a concise summary, I can do something simple like:

• A short news summary.
• Background on injuries and impact for the Germany squad.
• Recent stats for Sané in UCL and Bundesliga this season, reminding them that my current knowledge is limited to data up to October 2024.

I should ask if the user wants me to look up current stats too, if possible!Clarifying response options

The harness network sandbox is set to default, allowing workspace-write and network-enabled operations, but I should ask for approval before using the network. It's important to check whether the user wants real-time stats first. Given the simple nature of the message, I can keep it concise and acknowledge their request.

I'll ask what they prefer: an explanation, a source, or a brief article/post. I could also clarify whether "土超" is a typo for "德甲," gently suggesting it.

I'll respond with these options concisely and polished!

这是在分享一条队况+数据的讯息吗？需要我做哪种处理：

1. 改写成一段新闻快讯
2. 出一条社媒文案
3. 查实并补全萨内的具体数据
4. 分析对德国队/俱乐部的影响

另确认一下，“土超”是笔误为“德甲”吗？萨内未在土超效力。若你指的是德甲，我可先给你一版精炼快讯稿，并在你需要时补上最新数据。